Stanley Kubrick Americans on the Moon. The US lunar scam has reached its end! Where truth begins and editing ends

The famous cosmonaut, who personally prepared to participate in the Soviet lunar exploration program, denied many years of rumors that American astronauts were not on the Moon, and that the footage broadcast on television around the world was allegedly edited in Hollywood.

He spoke about this in an interview with RIA Novosti on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first landing of US astronauts in human history, celebrated on July 20. Neil Armstrong And Edwin Aldrin to the surface of the Earth's satellite.

Correspondent: So were the Americans or were they not on the moon?

“Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about footage allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves. By the way, the first person who began to disseminate these rumors, was jailed for libel"- noted in this regard

Famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov

Correspondent: Where did the rumors come from?

“And it all started when, at the celebration of the 80th birthday of the famous American film director Stanley Kubrick, who based his brilliant film “2001 Odyssey” on the book of science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, journalists who met with Kubrick's wife asked to talk about her husband's work on a film in Hollywood studios. And she honestly reported that there are only two real lunar modules on Earth - one in a museum, where no filming has ever been carried out, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is located in Hollywood, where, in order to develop the logic of what was happening on the screen, additional filming of the landing was carried out Americans to the Moon"- the Soviet cosmonaut specified.

Correspondent: Why was studio additional filming used?

He explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see on the movie screen the development of what is happening from beginning to end, elements of additional shooting are used in any movie.

“It was impossible, for example, to film a real discovery Neil Armstrong the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon - there was simply no one to remove it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film Armstrong’s descent to the Moon along the ladder from the ship. These are the moments that were truly captured Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what was happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossips that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set,"- explained

Correspondent: Where does truth begin and editing end?

"The actual shooting began when Armstrong, Having set foot on the Moon for the first time, he got used to it a little and installed a highly directional antenna through which the broadcast was carried out to Earth. His partner Buzz Aldrin Then he also left the ship on the surface and began filming Armstrong, who, in turn, filmed his movement on the surface of the Moon,”- the astronaut specified.

Is this true?

Let us ask ourselves the question: what is the volume of completed photographs in the Kubrick pavilion?

There is no atmosphere on the Moon or in Earth orbit to scatter sunlight. Therefore, the shadows are completely dark and the sky is black, even when the Sun is shining. The harsh lighting creates a striking effect.

Sun and Earth as seen from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.

Photo taken by astronaut Gregory Harbaugh. The photo shows his colleague Joseph Tanner during the second spacewalk associated with servicing the space telescope. Hubble in February 1997. The photo also shows the aft part of the space shuttle Discovery and the Sun hanging above the thin crescent of the Earth's limb. Tanner holds a test sheet in his left hand, and Harbau is reflected in the helmet of his spacesuit. NASA

That's how it should be. In this case, a Hasselblad with focal length 60 mm than in the top Apollo 11 image. This means that the objects in the images will be 25% smaller, in particular the Sun. However, in the photographs of man’s stay on the Moon in 1969-1972, everything is different - there is an optical crown and halo around the sun, the angular dimensions of the “sun” are 10 degrees! This is twenty times larger than the actual size of 0.5 degrees (the apparent size of the Sun in the vicinity of the Earth). Below is a series of pictures.

View of the sun near the landing site of the LM. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6739

View of the sun 100 meters from the LM landing site. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6763

View of the sun 300 meters from the LM landing site. Apollo 14. AS14-64-9177

View of the sun 4 km from the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-87-11745

View of the sun near the landing site of the LM. Apollo 15. AS15-85-11367

View of the sun 300 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 16. AS16-109-17856

View of the sun 100 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 17. AS17-134-20410

View of the sun 50 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 17. AS17-147-22580. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.

The halo and corona around the sun in the Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 images indicate the presence of an atmosphere. Details about halos and optical phenomena. Below are pictures of the halo and crown of light sources on Earth in the presence of an atmosphere.

The sun and the halo around it for terrestrial conditions.

Rays and crown of the sun for terrestrial conditions

Crowns of the Sun.

Halo and crowns of street lamps

1. Optical phenomena are associated with refraction and diffraction by atmospheric water droplets.

The diagram shows how two points on the surface of a droplet can scatter light and act as sources of a diverging spherical wave. The light increases where the crests of the waves coincide or are of the same sign. The intensity of light decreases where the waves have different amplitudes. Scattered light from the entire surface of the drop plus the contribution of the reflected and transmitted waves are combined in a diffraction pattern - the corona.

In the first picture shows the corona caused by the diffraction of light by small particles. Each point on the illuminated surface is a source of scattered diverging spherical waves (Huygens-Fresnel principle). Diverging waves intersect each other, where they add up they give areas of increased brightness, and where they subtract they give dark areas.
In the second picture shows scattering from only two points along the central axis, the direction of the incident light, the ridges of the two scattered waves always coincide with the shape of the area with bright light intensity.
In the third picture the sum of all coronas from each spectrum and each particle is shown.

All Apollo photographs of optical phenomena from the sun fit completely within the framework of refraction and diffraction by atmospheric water droplets.

2. Increasing the angular dimensions of the “Sun”

In the case of a vacuum, the angular dimensions of the sun, like any light source, remain the same. In the presence of an atmosphere the situation is different.

Any light wave is scattered by electrons, atoms and molecules of the atmosphere. Moreover, the intensity of the scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the light wavelength. Because of this, each particle becomes a source of light, especially for blue rays. This is approximately like a diverging wave from a float after the main wave passes through it. As a result, due to the presence of the atmosphere, the molecules emit light in all directions, especially brightly near the light source. At very high brightness and exposure, it leads to flare on the film and an increase in the angular dimensions of the light source. An example is given below.

Electric arc; size approximately 5 millimeters. Due to the scattering of light on air molecules, the size of the light ball is tens of times larger than the size of the plasma arc channel.

Finally, when there is little coverage of the light source, a halo is maintained due to light scattering in the atmosphere. We see this in the Apollo photographs. In a real vacuum there are no such optical phenomena.

Apollo 14. AS14-66-9305

3. The cause of optical phenomena on the Moon is dust.

On Earth, we often see the sun blurry, for example through a cloud. This is the scattering of sunlight on aerosols (fog, smoke, dust). Their volume in the earth’s atmosphere is no more than 0.1% of the volume of gases that make up the atmospheric air. The same can be assumed for the Moon. This means that to observe at least approximately the same optical phenomena (corona, crown and light scattering), total mass particles on the Moon per unit volume should be at least 1 g/m³. This is a huge number of particles and is equivalent to the existence of an aerosol atmosphere on the Moon. So far, nothing like this has been discovered.

DISCUSSION

We have more than 5% of the volume of photographs of man's stay on the Moon from 1969-1972 with images of halos, crowns of the Sun and light scattering, which indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Considering that 5% of the images are included in the panoramas of the area, it can be firmly stated that 30% of the images from the total volume of photographic materials or more than 70% of the astronauts’ stay on the surface of the “Moon” were taken in the presence of an atmosphere.

The Apollo 12 panorama (a12pan1162447) consists of more than two dozen photographs, two of which are of the Sun.

More than 70% of photographic documents are pre-filmed photographs of Stanley Kubrick! The statement of the famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov in support of the Americans being on the Moon and about minor additional studio filming is untenable.
In addition, all images are interconnected in libraries: 1) expedition outputs, 2) image numbers, 3) audio conversations, 4) Apollo videos on the official website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). This means that photographs of terrestrial origin, along with audio conversations accompanying them, are presented by NASA as documents about man’s stay on the Moon.

Conclusion: This is a falsification of man's presence on the Moon, which has been supported at the highest official level for more than 40 years.

+ Glare and optical effects from the “sun” for Apollo 11.

First, What is important to note is the presence of up to 10 different optical axes (the optical axis is the lens) and the absence of one axis of the light source (in this case, the Sun) in the images.

According to the laws of Optics, all glare on the optical axes for one light source converges at one point. This is not present in any photographs of Apollo 11 during their stay on the surface of the Moon.

At the same time, for images from the Apollo 11 orbit, we see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable.

Several light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 are also indicated by the doubling of the lunar module's shadow.

Below are pictures

Multiple light source axes. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5872HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

Three axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5935HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

These patterns are obvious for other images with optical flares.
Below are highlights from the Sun in the same Hasselblad Apollo 11 camera:

View of Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.

View of the Earth from orbit; Apollo 11, AS11-36-5299. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm

We see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of light effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable.

Several light sources in the sky on the “Moon” for Apollo 11 are also indicated by the doubling of the lunar module’s shadow:

Double shadows from the lunar module indicate multiple light sources above the lunar surface. AS11-37-5463, AS11-37-5475, AS11-37-5476 and with increased contrast and brightness. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Magazine: 37; Description: LUNAR MODULE SHADOW ON SURFACE; Film Width: 70 mm.

One could suggest that there are always two shadows on the Moon - one from the Sun, the other from the huge and bright crescent of the Earth!

However, look - this is the Earth in the Apollo 11 images:

View of the Lunar Module and Earth for Apollo 11; AS11-40-5923, AS11-40-5924. LUNAR MODULE; EARTH.

Compare with the brightness of the Sun (see pictures above). In general, the Sun is far from the most powerful star in existence, but it is relatively close to the Earth and therefore shines very brightly - 500,000 times brighter than the full Moon and 5,000 times brighter than the full Earth when observed from the Moon. Our planet shines several orders of magnitude lower! In addition, keep in mind that the Earth is at its zenith. And what is the shadow of the Earth?! Below you!

All together are NASA absurdities and lack of knowledge.

But even after the publication of this fact that photographs of Apollo 11 on the Moon indicate the presence of several light sources in the sky and this is a falsification, NASA defenders persist in their assertion: “Americans walked on the Moon.” Amazing nature debaters!

This note about several light sources in the sky on the Moon does not apply to glare for the remaining stay missions: Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17. For the images of these missions, we have a single axis light source. And here it should be noted that the shooting conditions are the same - the sun’s low position above the horizon, the optical equipment is the same - a Hasselblad camera, the shooting technique is the same, the picture is the same as for Orlov... However, the axis of the light source is unique. Photos of Apollo 11 fall out of general pattern. Probably, NASA in the “first” flight to the Moon did not have enough power of one searchlight.

You can also note the minor “oddities” of glare on the optics of Apollo 11, and the Apollo mission as a whole:

the presence of equidistant twisted spirals in the glare, as in a long-range spotlight;
asymmetry of the highlight elements, which is possible if the light source itself does not have symmetry;
glare from the presence of a drop of liquid on the lens (reflection on the surface of the drop);
halo and crown (crown) around the sun for Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17, which is only possible in the presence of an atmosphere;
other.

The halo and corona around the sun in the Apollo 17 image (AS17-147-22580) indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Details about halos and optical phenomena. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.

Conclusion: in front of us, several light sources illuminate the surface of the "Moon" for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This indicates NASA's hoax of lunar conditions in the pavilion on Earth.

Legendary director Stanley Kubrick (" 2001: A Space Odyssey", "A Clockwork Orange", "The Shining", "With Wide eyes closed") a few days before his death admitted that The US government and NASA paid him a large sum of money for filming the landing of American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin on the moon.In fact, the historical footage was allegedly filmed by him in an ordinary studio on Earth.

In the photo: Stanley Kubrick while working on the film "2001: A Space Odyssey"

Such a sensational statement was made by aAmerican Patrick Murray, publishing a video interview allegedly with Stanley Kubrick, made 15 years ago.

As explained on the website, the film director’s interview appeared only now, since Murray had to sign an 80-page non-disclosure agreement for the content of the conversation for 15 years from the death of Kubrick, who, we recall, died on March 17, 1999.

I have committed a huge fraud on the American public. With the participation of the United States government and NASA. The moon landing was faked, all the landings were faked, and I was the person who filmed it."

a man who looks like Stanley Kubrick confesses in the video.

“What are you saying? Are you serious? - Murray laughs.

“Yes, it’s fake,” the American director repeats again.

According to Kubrick, the moon landing was just a fantasy of President Nixon, who really wanted to make it a reality. The US government offered the director a large sum of money for filming a plausible video document, and he allegedly agreed to make a “movie.”

However, there is no official evidence yet that this interview really real. Perhaps the footage is just an actor who looks very much like a famous director.

Let's remember that on July 20, 1969, the whole world saw the now historic footage of Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong doing " one small step for a man, one giant leap for all mankind."

It is worth noting that in 1971, Kubrick moved from the USA to the UK. IN recent years During his life, the director repeatedly stated that the American intelligence services would kill him. In 1999, he died, according to the official version - from a heart attack, but many experts believe that the director was murdered.

The wife of director Christian Kubrick, after the death of her husband, also claimed that the moon landing was faked in order to “save the honor and dignity of the United States.”

Meanwhile, Alexey Leonov, the first person to enter open space, in an interview with TK "Zvezda" denied rumors that American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin did not land on the Moon.

Specialists, including myself, and our lunar group watched one to one online as it happened. And Bormann’s flight with the flyby in Moscow, and the landing, and Apollo 13 too,” -

quoted by Leonov's TV channel.

In a comment to the site, a pilot-cosmonaut, twice a Hero Soviet Union explained that some of the footage about Armstrong and Aldrin’s flight to the moon was actually completed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see “the development of what is happening from beginning to end.” The actual filming begins after Armstrong installs a highly directional antenna for broadcast to Earth.

Who will film the hatch opening from the side when there is no one there on the Moon?” -

Leonov explained why additional footage of the landing was needed.

The video of American astronauts landing on Earth's satellite has been causing controversy for decades. Rumors about the falsification of the Moon flight spread after the widow of American director Stanley Kubrick told reporters about her husband's participation in the filming of a film about the Apollo 11 mission.

Journalists came to Kubrick's wife, and she said: yes, he worked hard when they made the film "Landing on the Moon." These are her words verbatim. And this (rumors about the falsification of the flight to the Moon - editor's note) is already speculation. And how the flag was dangling, but there was no wind. And the flag was reinforced and twisted. When they put it in the ground, they removed the cover - the reinforced tape untwisted, and it seemed as if it was dangling in the wind,”

explained the legendary Soviet cosmonaut.

In 2009, Alexei Leonov already spoke out about rumors claiming that the Americans were not on the Moon in 1969. In an interview with RIA Novosti, Leonov emphasized that only “absolutely ignorant people” can believe in such things.

Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans have not been to the Moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about footage allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves,” -

Alexey Leonov noted then.

Stanley Kubrick filmed the Apollo moon landing

Famous astronaut Alexey Leonov, who was personally preparing to participate in the Soviet lunar exploration program, denied many years of rumors that American astronauts were not on the Moon, and the footage broadcast on television around the world allegedly mounted in Hollywood.

Correspondent: So were the Americans or were they not on the moon?

Famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov

Correspondent: Where did the rumors come from?

“And it all started when, at the celebration of the 80th birthday of the famous American film director Stanley Kubrick, who created a science fiction novel based on the book Arthur C. Clarke In his brilliant film "2001 Odyssey", journalists who met with Kubrick's wife asked to talk about her husband's work on the film in Hollywood studios. And she honestly said that on Earth there is only two real lunar modules – alone in the museum, where no filming has ever been carried out, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is in Hollywood, where to develop the logic of what is happening on the screen and additional filming was carried out American landing on the Moon,” the Soviet cosmonaut said.

Correspondent : Why did you use studio additional filming?

Alexey Leonov explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see on the movie screen the development of what is happening from beginning to end, elements of additional shooting.

“It was impossible, for example, to film a real discovery Neil Armstrong the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon - there was simply no one to remove it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film Armstrong’s descent to the Moon along the ladder from the ship. These are the moments that really completed Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what was happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossips that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set,” explained Alexey Leonov.

Correspondent : Where does truth begin and editing end?

“The real shooting began when Armstrong, who first set foot on the Moon, got a little used to it, installed a highly directional antenna through which the broadcast was carried out to Earth. His partner Buzz Aldrin Then he also left the ship on the surface and began filming Armstrong, who, in turn, filmed his movement on the surface of the Moon,” the astronaut said.

Is this true?

Let's ask ourselves a question : what is the volume of completed filming? pictures in the Kubrick pavilion?

On the Moon and in Earth orbit no atmosphere to diffuse sunlight. Therefore the shadows completely dark, and the sky is black, even when the sun is shining. The harsh lighting creates a striking effect.

Sun and Earth as seen from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293..

Photo taken by an astronaut Gregory Harbaugh. The photo shows his colleague Joseph Tanner during the second spacewalk related to servicing the space telescope. Hubble in February 1997. The photo also shows the aft part of the space shuttle Discovery and the Sun hanging above the thin crescent of the Earth's limb. Tanner holds a test sheet in his left hand, and Harbau is reflected in the helmet of his spacesuit. NASA

That's how it should be. In this case, on the surface of the “moon” a Hasselblad with a focal length of 60 mm is used than in the top image of Apollo 11. This means that objects in the images will be 25% smaller, in particular the Sun. However, in the photographs of man’s stay on the Moon in 1969-1972, everything is different - an optical crown and halo around the sun, the angular dimensions of the “sun” are 10 degrees! This twenty times larger than the actual size of 0.5 degrees (the apparent size of the Sun in the vicinity of the Earth). Below is a series of pictures.

View of the sun near the landing site of the LM. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6739

View of the sun 100 meters from the LM landing site. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6763

View of the sun 300 meters from the LM landing site. Apollo 14. AS14-64-9177

View of the sun 4 km from the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-87-11745

View of the sun near the landing site of the LM. Apollo 15. AS15-85-11367

View of the sun 300 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 16. AS16-109-17856

View of the sun 100 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 17. AS17-134-20410

View of the sun 50 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo17.AS17-147-22580. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.

Halo and crown around the sun in the image of Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 indicate the presence of an atmosphere. Details about halos and optical phenomena. Below are pictures of the halo and crown of light sources on Earth in the presence of an atmosphere.

The sun and the halo around it for terrestrial conditions.

Rays and crown of the sun for terrestrial conditions

Crowns of the Sun.

Halo and crowns of street lamps

1. Optical phenomena are associated with refraction and diffraction by atmospheric water droplets

The first picture shows the corona caused by the diffraction of light by small particles. Each point on the illuminated surface is a source of scattered diverging spherical waves ( Huygens-Fresnel principle). Diverging waves intersect each other, where they add up they give areas of increased brightness, and where they subtract they give dark areas.

The second picture shows scattering from only two points along the central axis, the direction of the incident light, the ridges of the two scattered waves always coincide with the shape of the area with bright light intensity.

The third figure shows the sum of all coronas from each spectrum and each particle.

All Apollo images with optical phenomena from the sun completely fit within the framework of refraction and diffraction by atmospheric water droplets.

2. Increasing the angular dimensions of the “Sun”

In the case of a vacuum, the angular dimensions of the sun, like any light source, remain the same. In the presence of an atmosphere the situation is different.

Electric arc; size approximately 5 millimeters. Due to the scattering of light on air molecules, the size of the light ball is tens of times larger than the size of the plasma arc channel.

Apollo 14. AS14-66-9305

3. The cause of optical phenomena on the Moon is dust

On Earth, we often see the sun blurry, for example through a cloud. This is the scattering of sunlight on aerosols (fog, smoke, dust). Their volume in the earth’s atmosphere is no more than 0.1% of the volume of gases that make up the atmospheric air. Similarly, one can assume for the Moon. This means that in order to observe at least approximately the same optical phenomena (corona, crown and light scattering), the total mass of particles on the Moon per unit volume must be at least 1 g/m³. This is a huge number of particles and is equivalent to the existence of an aerosol atmosphere on the Moon. Still nothing of the kind was not found.

DISCUSSION

We have more than 5% of the volume of photographs of man's presence on the Moon in 1969-1972, depicting halos, crowns of the Sun and light scattering, which indicates the presence of atmosphere. Considering that 5% of the images are included in the panoramas of the area, it can be firmly stated that 30% of the images from the total volume of photographic materials or More than 70% of astronauts' stays on the surface of the Moon were made in the presence of an atmosphere.

The Apollo 12 panorama (a12pan1162447) consists of more than two dozen photographs, two of which are of the Sun.

More than 70% of photographic documents are pre-filmed photographs of Stanley Kubrick! Statement by the famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov in support of the Americans being on the Moon and about minor additional studio filming insolvent.

In addition, all images are interconnected in libraries: 1) expedition outputs, 2) image numbers, 3) audio conversations, 4) Apollo videos on the official website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). This means that the photographs are of terrestrial origin, along with audio conversations accompanying them from NASA issues for documents of man's presence on the Moon.

Conclusion: This falsification human presence on the Moon, which has been maintained at the highest official level for more than 40 years.

Glare and optical effects from the "sun" for Apollo 11

The first thing that is important to note is the presence of up to 10 different optical axes (the optical axis is the lens) and the absence of one axis of the light source (in this case, the Sun) in the images. According to the laws of Optics, all glare on the optical axes for one light source converges at one point. This not in any photo Apollo 11 during their stay on the surface of the Moon. At the same time, for images from the Apollo 11 orbit, we see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable.

On some double vision shadows of the lunar module.

Below are pictures

Multiple light source axes. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5872HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

Three axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5935HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

These patterns are obvious for other images with optical flares. Below are highlights from the Sun in the same Hasselblad Apollo 11 camera:

View of Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.

View of the Earth from orbit; Apollo 11, AS11-36-5299.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm

We see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of light effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable. On some light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 also indicate double vision lunar module shadows:

Dual shadows from the lunar module indicate multiple light sources above the lunar surface. AS11-37-5463, AS11-37-5475, AS11-37-5476 andWithincreasedcontrast, brightness. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Magazine: 37; Description: LUNAR MODULE SHADOW ON SURFACE; Film Width: 70 mm.

Two shadows exactly follow the contour of the lunar module and details: an antenna for long-distance communications and for radio communications of astronauts, a system of auxiliary engines, and more. And this is not one random shot, not three shots, but series of photographs Magazine 37 – approx. 20 shots! One could suggest that there are always two shadows on the Moon - one from the Sun, the other from the huge and bright crescent of the Earth! However, look - this is the Earth in the Apollo 11 images:

View of the Lunar Module and Earth for Apollo 11; AS11-40-5923, AS11-40-5924. LUNAR MODULE; EARTH.

Compare with the brightness of the Sun (see pictures above). In general, the Sun is far from the most powerful star in existence, but it is relatively close to the Earth and therefore shines very brightly - 500,000 times brighter than the full Moon and 5,000 times brighter than the full Earth when observed from the Moon. Our planet is shining several orders of magnitude lower! In addition, keep in mind that the Earth is at its zenith. And what is the shadow of the Earth?! Below you!

All together - these are NASA absurdities and lack of knowledge

But even after the publication of this fact that photographs of Apollo 11 on the “Moon” indicate the presence of several light sources in the sky and this is a falsification, NASA defenders persist in their: “Americans walked on the Moon.” The amazing nature of debaters!

This note about multiple light sources in the sky on the “Moon” does not apply to glare for the remaining missions: Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17. For images from these missions, we have one axis of the light source. And here it should be noted that the shooting conditions are the same - the sun is low above the horizon, the optical equipment is the same - a Hasselblad camera, the shooting technique is the same, the picture is the same as for Orlov... However, the axis of the light source is unique. Photos of Apollo 11 fall out from a general pattern. Probably NASA on its "first" flight to the Moon there wasn't enough power one spotlight.

You can also note the minor “oddities” of glare on the optics of Apollo 11, and the Apollo mission as a whole:

– the presence of equidistant twisted spirals in the glare, as in a long-range spotlight;

– asymmetry of the highlights elements, which is possible if you the light source has no symmetry;

– glare from the presence of a drop of liquid on the lens (reflection on the surface of the drop);

– halo and crown (crown) around the sun for Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17, which is possible only if there is atmosphere;

- other.

The halo and corona around the sun in the Apollo 17 image (AS17-147-22580) indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Details OhaloAndopticalphenomena . Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.

Conclusion: before us some light sources illuminate the surface of the "Moon" for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This indicates hoax NASA lunar conditions in the pavilion on Earth.

USA lunar scam. Yuri Mukhin. MaximumliesAndnonsense

More details and a variety of information about events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet can be obtained at Internet Conferences, constantly held on the website “Keys of Knowledge”. All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite everyone who wakes up and is interested...

In the lunar epic there are always 2 camps: those who believe that the Americans were on the Moon, and those who do not believe. And if the chief director from NASA himself said that he filmed the Moon landing on Earth, would that convince you? Because this video appeared in December 2015, 15 years after Kubrick's death in 1999, so that his family would not suffer.

1. Why did you decide to do this interview? Because he has matured as a person, he says “he has gone through personal evolutionary growth,” when morality means more to him than money and fame. This happened against the backdrop of how former astronaut Neil Armstrong, who is considered the first person to walk on the surface of the Moon, became isolated and drank himself because of all this falsehood of the government and NASA, which was forbidden to talk about with anyone. from those around.

2. Kubrick made a video about the lunar landing, filmed on Earth. For this purpose the technology was used FRONT PROJECTIONS ", already tested in "A Space Odyssey 2001", so that it seems to you that there is endless space behind the astronauts lunar landscape, although each set where they moved was only a few tens of meters away.

3. Kubrick regrets making this fake, although he is proud of it, calling it “the greatest masterpiece.” An ambiguous feeling for him seems to be bad, but it is very pleasant and warming, he does not want to give it up.

4. The long breaks between his films are explained by the fact that within the director’s personality there was a struggle for fame, and observation of the effect of the spread of lies. Therefore, after the film "" 1980, which we reviewed in the previous article, he waited a whole 7 years to film " Full metal jacket", and then another 13 years to film " With eyes wide shut" V 1999. By the way, " With eyes wide shut"was released in July 1999, exactly 30 years after the Moon landing (July 1969). Kubrick always loved the language of symbols, saying that people (we all) live with " eyes wide shut «.

5. He filmed the “moon landing” to keep up with President John F. Kennedy’s promise: “There will be Americans on the moon before the end of the 1960s.” Therefore, the landing was shown in 1969, exactly as predicted. It was necessary to report to voters.

6. In the beginning, it was planned that they would film everything on Earth, type for insurance, if they don’t have time, and as soon as the technical opportunity arises, they will send Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins there first, so that they don’t feel like the world’s deceivers, but we have to wait a little. Then it was postponed again and again, and in the end they were told that it was unrealistic. But the video of the lunar landing had already gone viral, and it was too late to admit it was fake.

7. Wernher von Braun, the head of the NASA Space Flight Center, immediately said that this project is nonsense, and it is impossible for people to fly to the Moon with current technologies, but they did not listen to him, but were told to draw a rocket. In parallel with this, a video was shot and scenery was prepared in the form of modules and rovers. How did it happen that the respected engineer Wernher von Braun became embroiled in a scam? So he was taken from Germany after the war, he was an advanced specialist, he made excellent VAF and V-2 rockets for Hitler, and now his life depended only on the USA. They told him: “We are flying.” He took the lead and until 1970 headed this center, designed a gigantic pseudo-rocket Saturn-5, which after only 2 test launches, one of which was unsuccessful, was accepted for manned flights. After the "successful lunar landings" and the closure of the "successful" lunar program, the rocket never flew again. Moreover, the German left NASA in 1972 “very disappointed,” and the flights lasted until 1975. 11 successful launches in a row, also the successful launch of the American Skylab laboratory into orbit. Do directors get fired for this? Or do they fire you when you have fulfilled your role as a “technical decoration” and are no longer needed?

There were drawings for the Saturn 5 rocket and F1 engines, naturally, “lost by NASA.” Today, Americans buy and fly Soviet RD-180 and NK-33 engines.

To give you an idea of the size of what the Americans allegedly flew, see the picture below. Number 1 and number 2 are the Soyuz and Proton rockets, developed during the 1960s lunar race. Current technology. They exist, they are built, they fly. Today they deliver crews and cargo to the ISS. Number 3 - Saturn 5. A huge fucking canoe, it could launch several ready-made modules into orbit today, deploy a ready-made station. After all, every single launch costs money, right? I would deliver the goods, yeah. If... I could fly...

8. Kubrick even made absurd videos with astronauts (for example, Apollo 13) even playing golf on the moon, because people in America needed to show something, preferably entertaining. They already jumped, ran, rode in a car, they need something new. The golf idea seemed “American” to him. Golf has been removed! After all, this is why they send to the moon... play golf!

It seems there is nothing more to add here. Although, no. There's something else.

American super emotions
afterlanding on the moon!

This is what the first interview of Americans Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins looks like in 1969, after the flight.

Just appreciate their delight, because they just became the first earthlings in the history of mankind (!) to reach and return from the Moon... What a success! The performance boiled down to the fact that they showed videos and photographs that everyone had already seen, but they commented on them, which Felt at the time of filming, that Felt before the frame, what after the moment. Do they look like people who have just completed an incredible flight by all standards and complexity?

Or do they look at each other in fear, so as not to completely screw up?