Why was Malakhov kicked out? Malakhov’s conflict with Channel One: latest news

This week there were rumors in the media that Andrey Malakhov terminates cooperation with Channel One, where he worked since 1992. This news came as a real shock to fans of the celebrity - after all, for 10 years they had enjoyed watching all the episodes of one of the country’s highest-rated shows, “Let Them Talk,” whose permanent host was Andrei all this time.

According to rumors, Malakhov decided to leave Channel One for VGTRK. However, neither the TV presenter himself nor the management of the TV channels comment on this information. However, today new details have appeared in the media, shedding light on the current situation. According to the Russian BBC Service, the reason for Andrei’s departure to VGTRK was the decision of the management of Channel One to add more political topics to the air of the show “Let Them Talk.”

As it turned out, this conflict situation began after Natalya Nikonova, who had previously worked in Malakhov’s program, returned to Channel One, but became a producer in the “Live Broadcast” program on “Russia 1”. “Nikonova returned to First to shake up the socio-political bloc before the presidential elections. When she arrived, everyone didn’t really understand what was happening. There was no conflict as such, but everyone was tense. She also did “Live Broadcast” on “Russia 1”. And this is s***. The editors don’t want to do sh*t,”- said the interlocutor of the Russian Air Force Service.

The insider added that so far no one from the “Let Them Talk” team has written a letter of resignation, but, according to rumors, “Evening News” announcer Dmitry Borisov and Dmitry Shepelev, who recently began hosting a new show on the First “On the Real”, are already trying out for Malakhov’s place. in fact." It is worth noting that none of them confirmed or denied this information.

Exclusive: why Ernst threw Maslyakov out of Channel One after Malakhov, what does the charge of corruption have to do with it, and where to buy the sensational remedy for treating joints.

Let us remember that a scandal recently erupted around the dismissal of Malakhov. Ernst simply removed him from Channel One because he mentioned medical corruption in the episode. The episode, which never aired, was about how doctors cripple people with diseased joints, hiding the truth from them! And about the drug from the Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. V.A. Nasonova, which can save millions of lives, while being distributed at a symbolic price!

Before the noise had time to subside, a scandal broke out new round: The media became aware of Maslyakov’s dismissal from Channel One. It is not surprising that the roots of Maslyakov’s dismissal also stem from the story of the pharmacy mafia and joint remedy. Our independent correspondents met with Maslyakov to find out what exactly happened on Channel One.

Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, could you remind our readers of the story of Andrei Malakhov’s dismissal? What happened on your first channel?”

: I'll tell you how it happened. Just make sure you don't fall off your chair.

Andrey made a program about disabled people who suffered from diseased joints because they were treated with expensive but ineffective means. Andrey told the world about the existence of an affordable remedy that treats arthritis, arthrosis, rheumatism and other diseases ONCE and FOR ALL.

Ernst was furious that Andrei did not agree with him on the topic of the program. As punishment, Kostya not only did not air the program, he fired Andrei, throwing him out into the street like a puppy.

They tried to “silence” this story on Channel One, but thanks to Andrei’s supporters, the truth broke through on the Internet and spread throughout it. I myself did not previously know the reason for Andrei’s dismissal, I read it on the Internet, and then met Andrei in person, and he confirmed all this.

Then I realized the scale of the corruption of the first channel! Previously, I did not pay attention to the fact that even in our humorous program they make adjustments to the text about pharmacies and doctors. Now the terrible truth has been revealed to me.

Channel One is COMPLETELY corrupted by the pharmacy mafia, which profits from Russian pensioners. They advertise on the first channel for remedies for joint pain, which are expensive, but in the end they only bring temporary relief and do not cure! And the worst thing is that our doctors know that a remedy from a NEW GENERATION has already been invented and tested, which really HELPS SICK JOINTS. But no one listens to them, advertising for the product is not broadcast, and the product itself is on the shelves of pharmacies!

Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, is your departure also connected with this story?”

: Not just connected, this story was the reason. I didn’t leave the first channel, I was “left” from there, as they say. Fired.

After a conversation with Andrei Malakhov, I was terribly indignant at this situation, and tried to push into the new issue of KVN several very caustic jokes about pharmaceuticals for joints, which Channel One advertises with all its might. So to speak, so that people at least think a little about who they believe and what they accept.

But they didn’t let me do this “sabotage.” Ernst immediately summoned me to his place and forced me to write a statement “of my own free will.”

He said that neither I nor Andrey understand what business means, and there is no place for people like that on Channel One. And the fact that in the country everyone after 40 begins to experience pain in the lower back, arms, legs, swelling, cramps, people suffer, it’s hard for them to walk and bend over - this doesn’t bother him. It is necessary to keep the channel afloat and pay employees salaries, and the main income of the channel is precisely the advertising of pharmaceutical, useless joint products.

Correspondent: “But judging by the loud headlines in the newspapers, the story didn’t end there?”

: Do you mean accusing me of corruption? Yes, this is really happening. Two days after my dismissal, I received a summons from the investigator, which stated that charges of corruption were being brought against me. This is irony!

Ernst, of course, brought the accusation. The reason was that I spoke out on social networks in support of Andrei Malakhov, and gave a link to an article by rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, who describes a new, REALLY WORKING drug for joints, released by the Research Institute of Rheumatology.

Ernst tried to turn things around so that the Research Institute of Rheumatology gave me a bribe so that I would advertise their medicine. Fortunately, the investigators are not devoid of common sense, and no criminal case was initiated.

Therefore, now I can safely speak out about the arbitrariness of the pharmacy mafia on Channel One, and I ask you to provide part of the interview with rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, cut from that same ill-fated program by Andrei Malakhov.

Viktor Sedelnikov, senior rheumatologist, Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. Nasonova, Moscow:

“In most cases, patients with joint diseases are offered treatment with chondoprotectors and other drugs that, with the best results, can slow down the development of a particular disease, nothing more. In some cases, people are treated with injections or surgery. As a result, the person does not feel pain and believes that everything is fine, while a cancerous tumor may already be growing in the body. And operations on joints in general very often end in disability or other serious complications. They are indicated only in the most extreme cases.

It is precisely because of the low effectiveness of the classical approach to treatment that the minds of specialists have always been occupied with the development of a drug that can truly treat diseased joints and restore people to health. At the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, we have created the first medicine of its kind that can truly restore joints.

The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program.

“ARTRAID cream” is a unique drug that so far has no analogues both abroad and in Russia.

At the moment, ARTRAID has undergone clinical trials and has shown extremely high rates of effectiveness. It helps even in advanced and severe cases, restoring cartilage tissue and returning joints to a healthy state. The medicine is unique in its characteristics. No other drug can effectively restore diseased joints, returning a person to a completely healthy state.

For clarity, we at the Research Institute of Rheumatology have compiled a table comparing ARTRAID cream with popular pharmaceutical products for joints.

The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program. Despite my high position, I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend the drug. I wholeheartedly recommend ARTRAID to everyone. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough has been made in the field of joint treatment. To my deep regret, pharmacy chains did not react, so ARTRAID never appeared on pharmacy shelves. I think the secret is that it is more profitable for pharmacies to sell temporary relief rather than a panacea.”

What should people do if pharmacies do not sell the drug?

We found a way out of the situation - the research institute’s specialists created a special website on their own where you can leave an application for “ARTRAID”. All you need to do is simply leave your name and contact information. After this, you will be contacted to confirm a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone could get their medicine, even if they had never ordered anything online before.

: I think the question is settled. Pharmacies offer outdated and dangerous drugs, while hiding from people the truth about a new drug that is distributed at the expense of the budget. Draw your own conclusions. This is your health and only you are responsible for it. Goodbye!

Authors and presenters of popular TV programs continue to leave Channel One. Most of them say that they do not find mutual understanding with management. TV presenters switch to other federal channels, competing with the first button. “360” talks about the latest and possible changes on the First.

RIA Novosti / Alexander Kryazhev

On Tuesday, August 15, it became known that Timur Kizyakov was added to the list of presenters who left Channel One. Earlier it was reported about the departure of Andrei Malakhov and Alexander Oleshko.

The reasons for Kizyakov’s dismissal are not officially reported, but it is believed that this is due to charitable activities TV presenter and his wife Elena. In December 2016, a scandal erupted related to the “You’re Having a Baby” column, which was published as part of the “While Everyone is Home” program. It showed video passports of orphans with the aim of finding new parents for them. The media received information that for the production of stories about orphans, Kizyakov immediately took money from Channel One, from the state, and from sponsors. The TV channel conducted its own investigation, which was followed by the dismissal of the presenter.

The TV presenter himself says that he was slandered and that everything was in order with the financial statements of his television company “Dom”, which produced video passports, and cooperation with the federal television channel was broken on his own initiative. The corresponding letter was sent to the channel on May 27.

We do not accept the methods of the management of Channel One that are currently being practiced there

According to him, when attacks on the program began, the channel’s management simply ignored the situation and did not stand up for Kizyakov’s team. He says that a number of companies that have begun to accuse him of embezzling money simply see him as a competitor, “because they see business in it.”

RIA Novosti / Ekaterina Chesnokova

Vedomosti wrote at the end of last year that Kizyakov’s company for the production of video passports for orphans received 110 million rubles from the Ministry of Education and Science and at the same time from regional authorities.

“When a sponsor is present in a program, the absolute majority of sponsorship advertising goes to the channel. Some small part remains for the development program, and that’s all. And the fact that the sponsor gives as a gift, and here a certificate for 100 thousand rubles was given, is directly addressed to the children's institution from where the child was shown,” explained Kizyakov.

The program “While Everyone is Home” has been broadcast on Channel One on Sundays since 1992. In it, famous people talked about themselves and their family over breakfast. Now the authors of the TV show are thinking about what to do in this situation.

A week ago, on August 9, it became known that showman Alexander Oleshko was also leaving Channel One. IN different times he hosted a number of entertainment programs, including the humorous parody show “Big Difference”, “One to One”, “Minute of Fame”, “Exactly the Same”.

“Being a free artist, I accepted an offer that I couldn’t refuse! Wherever and whoever you are with, the main task remains to give the viewer joy, peace of mind and good mood“Oleshko wrote on his Instagram. Now the TV presenter can be seen in the show “You are Super!” Dancing”, which will air on NTV.

RIA Novosti / Vladimir Astapkovich

Rumors about the departure of Showman Andrei Malakhov in social networks back at the end of July. Later the information was confirmed. Competent sources claimed that Malakhov was leaving due to the fact that he could not work well with the new producer of “Let Them Talk” Natalya Nikonova. She recently returned to the channel and, according to one version, insisted that the popular talk show have more socio-political topics. Malakhov was categorically against this approach.

The TV presenter, according to some, decided to leave to host the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya 1 TV channel. Along with him, the main part of the team that was involved in the production of “Let Them Talk” left. Malakhov himself wrote in the Vedomosti newspaper that the reason for his dismissal was precisely a conflict with management.

It has already been leaked to the media that Andrei Malakhov met with the team of the new project that he will lead and discussed the creation of the program. It is reported that the first program will be released at the end of August.

The series of dismissals of Channel One presenters may well continue. The website M24.ru previously said that TV presenter Elena Malysheva and Leonid Yakubovich could quit. However, in a conversation with “360” they did not confirm this information.

“Nothing happens on the channel and everything is great. But everyone has their own problems. Some programs are closed, some are changed. Some people are simply unhappy. We're not going anywhere. Until we are closed, we will work,” Leonid Yakubovich’s representative Anatoly denied the information.

Among the potential new hosts of “Let Them Talk” is the outrageous actor Nikita Dzhigurda. He told “360” that this was discussed, but he accuses the TV channel of slandering himself and his family, so he did not agree. Moreover, Dzhigurda connects the dismissal of Andrei Malakhov precisely with the fact that he once in his program accused the actor of forging the will of his rich girlfriend.

RIA Novosti / Maxim Bogodvid

“The transfer of Malakhov is connected with our statements to the police, the court and with the scandal provoked by the “Let Them Talk” program. The management of Channel One, in order to relieve themselves of responsibility and report that measures had been taken, started this game with Malakhov’s departure. My dream is for [Konstantin] Ernst to be fired from his position. I am convinced that few people want to tolerate the immoral methods that Channel One rebroadcast and with which dissenting journalists leave,” says the artist.

In a conversation with 360, other top presenters of Channel One said that they have no complaints against the management yet. “I cannot comment on the situation with the departure of the presenters, because I do not work there. Channel One simply buys my show, and I don’t plan to break off relations with them. I have no complaints about Channel One,” said journalist Vladimir Pozner.

Another old-timer of the channel, TV presenter and traveler Dmitry Krylov, agrees with him, who says that he has no complaints about his management. “And it would not be very correct for me to comment on the situation with the departure of the presenters, since I work on Channel One,” Krylov said.

Almost all viewers are already aware that the television journalist has now become the host of the “Live Broadcast” television program. Previously, as you know, he hosted the talk show “Let Them Talk.”

Channel “Russia 1” has updated the program, and now it is called “Andrey Malakhov. Live broadcast." Moreover, Malakhov became not only its presenter, but also its producer. Moreover, it didn’t stop there, and he will also host his own TV show “Tonight”. The TV journalist wrote about this on his page on the social network Instagram.

Loyal fans of the TV journalist again began to wish him success in new TV shows and promised to watch all the TV programs that he hosts without fail, and it doesn’t matter to them which channel will broadcast them.

Relatively recently, presenter Andrei Malakhov explained the reasons why he left Channel One, where he worked for 25 years. On the website of his own publication Starhit, he published an open farewell address to his colleagues on Channel One. In his publication, he not only explained the reasons for this important decision, but also expressed gratitude to each employee.

According to Malakhov, when he turned forty-five years old, he realized that he needed to go beyond the standard framework, strive for something new, and move forward.

An additional impetus was the program's move to another studio.

According to the TV presenter, they called him and made him a tempting offer to host a program where he himself would decide what and how to do, and not carry out instructions from management.

In his farewell letter to Channel One, he thanked all employees for their overall teamwork and for the life experience gained.

Later, in another interview, he said that Channel One gradually began to “destroy” what he had been building for so long and everything that was dear to him.

“Despite the desire to leave the project, I brought the season to the end, and only then said goodbye.”

The TV presenter himself refused to comment on rumors that Andrei Malakhov left Channel One because of the appearance of Natalya Novikova.

There were various rumors in society about the reason for Malakhov’s departure from the channel: conflicts with management, unstable payment of money, the appearance of Novikova and others.

Andrey stated that wages on “Russia 1” is exactly the same as it was there.

“If you have been watching me and my career growth for a long time, you know that it is unusual for me to change something and I never wanted any new changes, but this time everything is happening differently, Itartass-sib reports. And I am grateful to fate that it is favorable to me and helps me with this,” Malakhov continues to say.

Let's end the story with a little story.

You know, my presence on the First can be described as follows: “It’s like first love, at first you enjoy what’s happening, and then it develops into a habit and dullness that doesn’t surprise, doesn’t inspire, and doesn’t even give an incentive to move on. People with less experience, I’ve been running my own projects for a long time now, and I’m still an errand boy.”

Andrey Malazov, latest news: Malakhov is losing ratings

The famous Russian actor Nikolai Burlyaev, “having clicked on all 40 TV channels, could not watch any further and turned off the TV.” He's worried about what's on the silver screen these days." moral values and patriotism is not in fashion,” EG quotes him.

The artist has spoken with Malakhov and Korchevnikov more than once, asking them questions about why they are digging through dirty laundry, why they drag it out on screens every evening. And in response I heard the same thing - “People are watching.”

After personnel changes at the “first button,” many wondered who would take the main place on the “Let Them Talk” program and where the presenter himself would go. There was even gossip about Malakhov's maternity leave. And he replaced Boris Korchevnikov in the talk show “Live”.

All the rumors about the fate of the two TV presenters significantly increased the channel's ratings. But for how long?

Conversations about the departure of TV presenter Andrei Malakhov from Channel One actually proved one thing: it is too early to discount television as a factor determining public opinion. A simple replacement of a popular presenter, his transition from one channel to another can cause something close to panic in society and the media. What happened, why did Andrei Malakhov suddenly decide to leave Channel One? There are so many rumors and speculations about this matter that we decided to look into it.

I do not rule out that the “trigger” of Andrei Malakhov’s conflict with the leadership was some careless word, a hint, or simply a tough conversation. This happens in a creative team. Colleagues from the “Let Them Talk” team with whom I had the opportunity to talk confirm: “Yes, there is a conflict. But the details are known only “at the top.” Perhaps they want to lure Andrey with money to another channel or there is a human factor at play. There are only two options. Either everything is resolved peacefully and Malakhov remains, or he switches to another channel - most likely to “Russia”. Several people from his team, who once started the “Big Laundry” with him, have already moved there.

The new producer put an end to Malakhov’s plans

It all started with the fact that Konstantin Ernst appointed a new producer of the talk show “Let Them Talk” - Natalya Nikonova. Nikonova is a famous person on TV. Twice winner of the national TEFI award, founder of the programs “Let them talk”, “Lolita without complexes”, “Malakhov+”, “Judge for yourself”. In general, a kind of “godmother” show for Russian housewives. IN lately she produced the show “Live” with Boris Korchevnikov on “Russia-1”. However, sources at VGTRK confidentially reported that Nikonova may have left “by pike command» after financial verification. The violations were allegedly discovered by Alexander Mitroshenkov, president of the Transcontinental Media Company, which includes New company- manufacturer " Live broadcast" Allegedly, Nikonova for a long time accrued the salary of her protégé, Dmitry Shepelev, who actually did not go on air. If so, what serious ideas could Nikonova offer to the leadership of “First” so that she would be hired? leadership position after such a scandal?

It is no secret that Malakhov for a long time asked Ernst for the opportunity to produce his own programs. Indeed, at the age of 45, running around the hall with a microphone and cutting your hair “like a boy” is somehow no longer respectable. But Ernst stubbornly did not meet the “face of the channel”, and the arrival of Natalya Nikonova on “First” finally put an end to Malakhov’s plans to produce the program independently. One of the editors of First commented on the situation: “The channel returned to the program the producer who worked there nine years ago, hoping that she would help raise the program’s severely fallen ratings. But Malakhov did not work well with her and demanded the return of his previous colleague. Since the channel did not make concessions for a long time, the presenter began to declare that otherwise he would leave.”

And indeed: back in 2013, the rating of the Malakhov talk show was 9%, it was ahead of the program “Voice”, “Time”, “Let’s Get Married”, “Vesti” and “ Ice age" However, recently “Let Them Talk” has been heavily criticized for the monotony of topics and some kind of morbid interest in finding out the authenticity of the paternity and motherhood of other people’s children (evil tongues even dubbed “Let Them Talk” a “branch of the DNA laboratory”). Ratings decreased accordingly - for example, in April they were only 6.2%.

Politics for housewives?

On topic

I have never been to the “Let Them Talk” program, despite the annoying invitations of the editors. The fact is that I know the technology of this project too well. Once there, the unfortunate “invitees” fall into a trap. An accompanying person is required to leave the studio. The invitee, who has undergone “psychological processing” by the editors, is sent to share his misfortune under the camera lenses and can no longer leave the studio. And so that the hero would not find out that his illegitimate children, neighbors and colleagues were called to the show, they were escorted through other entrances. The effect of surprise turned out to be very strong, but not always pleasant and, you see, correct. Now the program will be filmed in a former factory workshop on Liza Chaikina Street. In the so-called “Teledom” there will be fewer “set-ups”. They say that Andrei Malakhov was categorically against moving the studio, and this became one of the reasons for the conflict.

However, there is another reason, which is talked about in whispers on the television sidelines, but is discussed with might and main in social networks people close to political structures. For example, political scientist Stanislav Belkovsky writes on his Facebook: “It is absolutely obvious that I should host the “Let Them Talk” program instead of Malakhov. In turn, I am ready to give up my places to Andrei Nikolaevich in the Direct Line and Panopticon programs on OTK Dozhd. This is a subtle hint that the show for housewives "Let Them Talk" will now, if rumors are to be believed, give preference to politics. However, according to our information, Andrei Malakhov spoke out categorically against this, using harsh expressions in relation to a person about whom the host of the country’s main channel clearly should not have spoken. But, as you know, “he who lives in a glass house should not throw stones.” This proverb is very popular on TV, where any careless word can cost a person his career. By the way, the fact that “Let Them Talk” is going to be politicized is indirectly confirmed by another fact: Andrei Borisov, the news editor’s “News” presenter, was tried for the role of the new leading project. However, according to reviews, it left a weak impression. As for Malakhov, then, again, according to rumors, his careless words cost him not only his work in “Let Them Talk” - it is even stated that he will allegedly no longer be on the screen at all.

There are other points of view on the situation. Malakhov’s colleagues, for example, express the version that, they say, the presenter “got starstruck” - 25 years of television fame “blew the roof off.” Maybe. But all these are accompanying circumstances, as well as Andrei Malakhov’s declared desire to leave for maternity leave(his wife Natalya Shkuleva is in the last months of pregnancy). Something else is alarming. As it became known, at the same time as darling Malakhov, the handsome Alexander Oleshko, the host of “Minute of Glory” and “Just the Same,” was fired from “First.” No matter how we treated these people, they were the “faces of the channel.” The conclusion suggests itself: “First” is weakening its position against the background of VGTRK. Is this a coincidence? In professional circles, it is not ruled out that the transition to the “second button” of strong personnel is only the beginning of Konstantin Ernst losing ground. Whether VGTRK First will be absorbed or not - this issue is now being discussed in the television environment with might and main. On the eve of the elections, as we know, anything is possible.