Saltykov Shchedrin the wild landowner what the work teaches. What do Salykov-Shchedrin’s fairy tales teach? What does a fairy tale teach?

What does a fairy tale teach? Wild landowner"?

The fairy tale teaches people not to be stupid

The landowner was stupid, the men did not please him in some way

In addition, at some point he stopped washing himself and became wild

So you need to maintain hygiene

Well, don’t do all sorts of stupid things - otherwise you’ll be called a fool.

The fairy tale is a little strange, but all fairy tales used to be like that.

It is worth noting that this fairy tale reflects modernity precisely in the fact that many people try to live at the expense of others, like this landowner, but at the same time trample these others into the dirt. And when people who think about themselves are left alone, then they become wild, because those people at whose expense they lived are no longer around. In my opinion, this fairy tale teaches that we must treat people with respect and mercy, because we all depend to some extent on each other. In any situation you need to remain human.

A special place in the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by fairy tales with their allegorical images, in which the author was able to say more about Russian society in the 60-80s of the 19th century than the historians of those years. Saltykov-Shchedrin writes these fairy tales for children of a fair age, that is, for an adult reader whose mind is in the state of a child who needs to open his eyes to life. The fairy tale, due to the simplicity of its form, is accessible to anyone, even an inexperienced reader, and therefore is especially dangerous for those who are ridiculed in it.

The main problem of Shchedrin's fairy tales is the relationship between the exploiters and the exploited. The writer created a satire on Tsarist Russia. The reader is presented with images of rulers (Bear in the Voivodeship, Eagle the Patron), exploiters and exploited (Wild Landowner, The Tale of How One Man Fed Two Generals), and ordinary people (The Wise Minnow, Dried Roach).

The fairy tale The Wild Landowner is directed against the entire social system, based on exploitation, anti-people in its essence. Preserving the spirit and style of a folk tale, the satirist talks about real events his contemporary life. The work begins as an ordinary fairy tale: In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, there lived a landowner. But then the element modern life: And that stupid landowner was reading the newspaper Vest. The news of the newspaper is reactionary-serfdom, so the stupidity of the landowner is determined by his worldview. The landowner considers himself a true representative of the Russian state, its support, and is proud of the fact that he is hereditary Russian nobleman, Prince Urus-Kuchum-Kildibaev. The whole point of his existence comes down to pampering his body, soft, white and crumbly. He lives at the expense of his men, but he hates and is afraid of them, and cannot stand the servile spirit. He rejoices when, by some fantastic whirlwind, all the men were carried away to who knows where, and the air in his domain became pure, pure. But the men disappeared, and such hunger set in that it was impossible to buy anything at the market. And the landowner himself became completely wild: he was all overgrown with hair, from head to toe, and his nails became like iron. He stopped blowing his nose a long time ago and walked more and more on all fours. He even lost the ability to pronounce articulate sounds. In order not to die of hunger, when the last gingerbread was eaten, the Russian nobleman began to hunt: he would spot a hare as if an arrow would jump from a tree, grab onto his prey, tear it apart with his nails, and eat it with all the entrails, even the skin. The landowner's savagery indicates that he cannot live without the help of a peasant. It was not without reason that as soon as the swarm of men was caught and put in place, flour, meat, and all kinds of living creatures appeared at the market.

The stupidity of the landowner is constantly emphasized by the writer. The first to call the landowner stupid were the peasants themselves; representatives of other classes called the landowner stupid three times (triple repetition technique): the actor Sadovsky (However, brother, you are a stupid landowner! Who gives you a wash, stupid?) generals, whom he treated instead of beef printed gingerbread cookies and candies (However, brother, you are a stupid landowner!) and, finally, a police captain (You are stupid, Mr. Landowner!). The stupidity of the landowner is visible to everyone, and he indulges in unrealistic dreams that he will achieve prosperity in the economy without the help of the peasants, and thinks about English machines that will replace the serfs. His dreams are absurd, because he cannot do anything on his own. And only one day the landowner thought: Is he really a fool? Could it be that the inflexibility that he so cherished in his soul, when translated into ordinary language, means only stupidity and madness? If we compare the well-known folk tales about the master and the peasant with the tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin, for example with the Wild Landowner, we will see that the image of the landowner in Shchedrin’s fairy tales is very close to folklore, and the peasants, on the contrary, differ from those in fairy tales. In folk tales, a smart, dexterous, resourceful man defeats a stupid master. And in the Wild Landowner, a collective image of workers, breadwinners of the country and, at the same time, patient martyrs and sufferers appears. So, modifying folk tale, the writer condemns the people's long-suffering, and his tales sound like a call to rise up to fight, to renounce the slave worldview.

Well, in short, the fairy tale teaches that the state cannot exist without the common people. And if it’s long, then I agree with jkhnjkh6457.

Meanwhile, although the police captain patronized the landowners, in view of such a fact as the disappearance of the peasant from the face of the earth, he did not dare to remain silent. The provincial authorities were also alarmed by his report and wrote to him: Who do you think will pay taxes now? Who will drink wine in taverns? Who will engage in innocent activities? The captain-police officer answers: the treasury should now be abolished, but innocent occupations were abolished by themselves, and instead of them, robberies, robbery and murders spread in the district. The other day, even he, the police officer, was almost killed by some kind of bear, not a bear, not a man, and he suspects that same stupid landowner who is the instigator of all the troubles is the bear-man.

The bosses became concerned and convened a council. They decided to catch the peasant and install him, and to instill in the most delicate manner the stupid landowner, who is the instigator of all the troubles, so that he stops his fanfare and does not interfere with the flow of taxes to the treasury.

As luck would have it, at this time provincial town An emerging swarm of men flew and showered the entire market square. Now they took this grace, put him in a whip and sent him to the district.

And suddenly there was again a smell of chaff and sheepskins in that district; but at the same time, flour, meat, and all kinds of livestock appeared at the market, and so many taxes arrived in one day that the treasurer, seeing such a pile of money, just clasped his hands in surprise and cried out:

And where do you scoundrels get it from!!

The tale of the Wild Landowner Saltykov - Shchedrin is very relevant today.

The landowner hated the peasants. But, left without his serf Senka, he began to run wild.

Don't neglect those who feed.

In his fairy tales, Saltykov-Shchedrin is very sympathetic to the people, but at the same time, he condemns them for their patience.

Saltykov-Shchedrin was not without reason held in Soviet era. He ridiculed rich, stupid officials and sympathized with the peasants. In his fairy tales, the simple man is always smarter than the master. In the fairy tale The Wild Landowner, everything is the same. Landowners are condemned. Sympathizes with the long-suffering peasants. Condemns them for their patience. I didn’t think that they were still studying the work of this writer. I have nothing against him, of course, but it’s all somehow one-sided)

Saltykov-Shchedrin Wild landowner. The work teaches you to be human, whether you are above on a throne or crawling below like a worm. Everyone should have human dignity and man should be equal to man, although the position, of course, may be different.

Saltykov-Shchedrin (pseudonym - N. Shchedrin) was a favorite writer of Soviet times. A monument was erected to him in Tver. He ridiculed the landowners and their unlimited power over the peasants. He himself was from a wealthy family. He was a vice-governor. His fairy tales were the voice of that time, when it was already clear that without the liberation of the peasants from the landowners, it is necessary for the prosperity of Russia. You can probably still find such landowners both in state-owned enterprises and among private owners. The attitude towards workers and peasants probably hasn’t changed much. You can just slam the door now and go to another place of work. But in the time of Saltykov you cannot escape the tyrant landowner.

M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin did not at all idealize the peasants, as one of the previous speakers claims. Take, for example, the fairy tale about two well-fed generals, in which the man himself tied a rope so that he would be tied up (in case he decides to run away).
When, during the last global crisis, not only proletarians, but also management began to lose their jobs, how many cries rang through the media. Guard, the light has converged like a wedge. They couldn’t even imagine that they would always cut a guy’s salary, force him to work more, fire half of them - and they would continue to receive insanely huge salaries and bonuses for unknown reasons.

This suggests that those in power (whether they have it: in parliament, in a specific company or in the fairy tale in question) really think that their orders generate material values, like magic spells, and the common people who create these values only prevents them from living, because they have no idea what and how in this world done.

Fairy tale by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, entitled The Wild Landowner, teaches, first of all, not to spit in a well from which you will have to drink. The landowner who is in charge actor works, at first he was not wild, but only very stupid, because he decided that the peasant in his domain did much more harm than good. Therefore, he decided to kill the peasant, but at the same time he was completely unadapted to life, to such an extent that he could not even prepare food for himself. So gradually he became wild, because he stopped looking after himself, began to walk on all fours and hunt, as wild animals do. That is, having thoughtlessly exterminated a man, he himself found himself on the verge of death. Stupidity is the biggest misfortune, which, if it begins at birth, does not leave a person throughout his life. And the price of mistakes made under its influence can be very, very high.

>Essays based on the work The Wild Landowner

What does a fairy tale teach?

A special place in the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by fairy tales with allegorical depictions of characters. The author wrote them at the final stage of his work and, from the height of his years, could express everything that had accumulated with experience. Therefore, his tales can hardly be classified as children's tales, but only as instructive ones. In them he touched upon those socio-political and moral problems, which worried people at the end of the 19th century, although the moral of these tales has not lost its relevance today.

In the work “The Wild Landowner” we see how a self-confident and not very smart prince drives out his peasants so that he can breathe easier and calmer. God heeded his prayers, although he knew that this landowner was rather stupid, but God felt sorry for the peasants whom he began to deliberately infringe on in everything, so he set them free. The landowner, of course, could not live long on his own. Bread, milk and meat disappeared from the market, the gardens were overgrown with grass, the house became abandoned, and the prince himself began to slowly turn into a beast. He did not wash, did not comb his hair, did not change his clothes, ate only gingerbread and candy, grew hair and, in the end, began to walk on all fours.

In my opinion, there is a lot of instructiveness in this tale. Firstly, the gentlemen could not do without their peasants. Each yard man had his own responsibilities, which only he knew how to cope with, and the landowner, who all the time just reclined and played grand solitaire, was unsuited to independent life. Secondly, a person, stopping communication with other people, gradually becomes wild. Having lost his people, the landowner was left to live surrounded by nothing but forests and wild animals, so over time he began to resemble a forest dweller himself, even making friends with a bear and going with him to hunt a hare.

The author loved to use such elements of the absurd to make his fairy tales easier to read and to make him smile. With his satire he laid the foundation for a new literary genre in Russian literature - allegorical fairy tales. His comparisons may sometimes sound ridiculous, but if you think about it, you can notice a kind of sarcasm and flavor in them. Saltykov-Shchedrin wrote more than thirty similar tales. They were all filled artistic sense and contained deep wisdom. And today, when we read them, we involuntarily smile at the comicality of the situation.

What does a fairy tale teach?

A special place in the work of Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by fairy tales with allegorical depictions of characters. The author wrote them at the final stage of his work and, from the height of his years, could express everything that had accumulated with experience. Therefore, his tales can hardly be classified as children's tales, but only as instructive ones. In them, he touched upon those socio-political and moral problems that worried people at the end of the 19th century, although the morality of these tales has not lost its relevance today.

In the work “The Wild Landowner”

we see how the self-confident and not very smart Prince drives out his peasants so that he can breathe easier and calmer. God heeded his prayers, although he knew that this landowner was rather stupid, but God felt sorry for the peasants whom he began to deliberately infringe on in everything, so he set them free. The landowner, of course, could not live long on his own. Bread, milk and meat disappeared from the market, the gardens were overgrown with grass, the house became abandoned, and the prince himself began to slowly turn into a beast. He did not wash, did not comb his hair, did not change his clothes, ate only gingerbread and candy, grew hair and, in the end, began to walk on all fours.

In my opinion, in this

There is a lot of instructive stuff in the tale. Firstly, the gentlemen could not do without their peasants. Each yard man had his own responsibilities, which only he knew how to cope with, and the landowner, who all the time just reclined and played grand solitaire, was unsuited to independent life. Secondly, a person, stopping communication with other people, gradually becomes wild. Having lost his people, the landowner was left to live surrounded by nothing but forests and wild animals, so over time he began to resemble a forest dweller himself, even making friends with a bear and going with him to hunt a hare.

The author loved to use such elements of the absurd to make his fairy tales easier to read and to make him smile. With his satire, he laid the foundation for a new literary genre in Russian literature - allegorical fairy tales. His comparisons may sometimes sound ridiculous, but if you think about it, you can notice a kind of sarcasm and flavor in them. Saltykov-Shchedrin wrote more than thirty similar tales. All of them were filled with artistic meaning and contained deep wisdom. And today, when we read them, we involuntarily smile at the comicality of the situation.

Other works on this topic:

Landowner Landowner - main character satirical tale by Saltykov-Shchedrin “The Wild Landowner”. This is a stupid character who decided to exterminate all his men because there were too many of them...
The meaning of the name Saltykov-Shchedrin's tales are distinguished by a surprisingly subtle sense of humor and closeness to reality. Most of them show the relationship between the “masters of life” and forced peasants. So...
A memorable moment More than thirty fairy tales were written by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, and all of them were meaningful and fascinating in their own way. He put a deep meaning into each such fairy tale....
What the author laughs at. A significant place in the work of the satirist M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin is occupied by instructive tales. Some of them are included in school curriculum, and some...
The main idea of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin’s fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” is caustic satire to the ruling class. All the action described in it takes place as if within the same estate...
Moral Lesson The tales of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin were written at the final stage of the writer’s work, somewhere between 1880 and 1886. The form of a fairy tale to expose social and moral problems...
In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, there lived a landowner, “and he had enough of everything: peasants, grain, livestock, land, and gardens. Was...
E. Schwartz's fairy tale “Two Maples” can undoubtedly teach a lot. First, obey your elders, especially your parents. If Yegorushka and Fyodor had listened to their mother and not left...

Essay text:

Each fairy tale by Salhykov-Shchedrin contains deep wisdom; to the lyric reader, all works seem surprisingly interesting and instructive. Fairy tales by Salykov-Shchedrin make us smile, because their plots are very funny, but humor is not the main thing in them. The main goal of the author is to show the injustice of the structure of the world and society; suggest to a person the answer to one or another topical question. And the reader continues to reread the tales of this author, marveling at their relevance to this day.
The tale of how one man fed two generals will probably be remembered by everyone who read it at least once in their lives. Any schoolchild or adult can easily remember its plot. The generals who found themselves on the island almost died of starvation. And their savior turned out to be the most ordinary peasant man. What is the deep wisdom of a fairy tale? The generals in this case personify the ruling class, which has money and power. A man is a people who, with their labor, sweat and blood, make existence powerful of the world this is prosperous and comfortable. But isn’t society monstrously unfair when completely useless generals enjoy the fruits of other people’s labor? And the man works tirelessly, and receives absolutely no gratitude. The generals take his efforts for granted.
Salzykov-Shchedrin paints such vivid pictures in fairy tales that the reader is left with absolutely no doubts about whose side the author is on. The writer, with caustic satire, ridicules the vices of the ruling class, shows the true face of its representatives, striking in its wretchedness and stupidity. For example, the fairy tale The Wild Landowner tells how one landowner decided to get rid of ordinary people and, thanks to this, make own life happy.
God fulfilled his prayers and removed the men from the estate. What has the life of this landowner become?
Gradually, complete desolation occurred in his estate and estate, and he himself became wild in the literal sense. This tale again makes us think about how great the role of ordinary people is in the achievements of civilization. The ruling class, which has property and money, turns out to be completely helpless in resolving the simplest issues. The author, with caustic irony, ridicules swagger and high opinion generals and landowners about themselves. They are sure that the world was created only for them and that ordinary people exist only to fulfill their whims. But as soon as, by the will of fate, they lose their assistants, representatives of the ruling class instantly degenerate, as happened with the generals, when on the island they almost ate each other from hunger, or with the wild landowner, who, without proper supervision and care, turned into a wild and ugly creature .
In Salhykov-Shchedrin's fairy tales, animals, fish, and birds often act. But the reader clearly sees in them human traits, desires, habits. And it’s so easy to draw an analogy between the wise minnow and people who spend their entire lives hiding from difficulties, not noticing that they are thereby depriving their existence of meaning, making it empty and themselves unhappy.

Rights to the essay “What do the fairy tales of Salykov-Shchedrin teach?” belong to its author. When quoting material, it is necessary to indicate a hyperlink to