Description, image and characterization of Mitrofan in the comedy “Minor”: useful information for writing. Characteristics of the hero Mitrofan from Fonvizin's comedy Minor Characteristics of Mitrofan from the comedy Minor

. “A slack young man,” the son of Messrs. Prostakov. In Fonvizin’s time, a “minor” was a name given to a young man of the noble class who did not have a written certificate of education issued by a teacher. Such a young man could neither marry nor enter the service.

Before starting to work on Minor, Fonvizin spent a year and a half in France, where he became closely acquainted with the life of this country, studied the advanced doctrines of the Enlightenment, jurisprudence and philosophy.

The idea for the play came to the writer after returning to Russia, which took place in 1778. Fonvizin finished work on the play in 1782, spending about three years on it.

Biography

Mitrofanushka is the son of an unpleasant couple named Prostakovs. The hero's mother, a provincial noblewoman by birth, is an evil woman. He does whatever he wants, allows himself all kinds of atrocities towards serfs and courtyard servants. At the same time, she loves her son and is trying to make him comfortable in life by marrying Sophia, a girl with a decent inheritance.

Sophia herself is in love with a young officer named Milon. This is a kind and well-behaved girl who was given an education, she has a guardian - an uncle who owns a large fortune. Prostakova has a brother named Taras Skotinin (this character is Mitrofanushka’s uncle). Skotinin, a pig lover, also wants to marry Sophia because of the inheritance.

Mitrofanushka's father is a weak and weak-willed man, uneducated, and cannot even read letters. He is under the thumb of his wife and thinks only about how to please her. An authoritarian wife can easily beat up Father Prostakov.

Mitrofanushka, just like his parents, did not want to study, but sought to get settled in life through marriage. The hero has teachers, including one former seminarian who teaches the hero to read and write in the Psalter, a retired sergeant who teaches arithmetic, and a former coachman, a German by birth and a noble smoker, posing as a scientist.

This rogue is hired to train the hero French and certain “sciences”, but does not fulfill his duties and only interferes with the work of other teachers. The mother is in fact not at all concerned with the upbringing and education of the hero, but only follows fashion trends in society of that time. Mitrofanushka also has a nurse, who is called “Eremeevna”.

Sophia is a distant relative of the Prostakov family. The girl grew up in Moscow and received a good upbringing, but after the death of her mother (her father died even earlier) she falls into the clutches of the Prostakovs. They “look after” the estate belonging to Sophia, while simultaneously robbing the heroine. The idea to marry the girl to Mitrofanushka is born in Prostakova’s head after a rich uncle appears on the horizon, who was thought to be dead, and at the same time a potential inheritance.

Due to her upcoming marriage, Mitrofanushka has a conflict with her uncle, Taras Skotinin, who is also thinking of marrying Sophia in order to get his hands on the pigs in the girl’s villages.

Sophia, meanwhile, meets with her longtime lover, the young officer Milon, and a rich uncle comes to pick up his niece from the Prostakovs. Prostakova is trying to flatter Sophia's uncle so that he agrees to Mitrofanushka's marriage to the girl. Uncle, however, is determined to take Sophia to Moscow the next morning.

The uncle gives the girl the opportunity to choose the groom herself, and she gives her hand to Milon, whom she knew back in her mother’s house. Having learned about this, Mitrofanushka's mother hatches a conspiracy. The Prostakovs’ people are trying to kidnap Sophia in order to force the girl to marry Mitrofanushka. Milon catches this scene and prevents the assassination attempt, after which the Prostakovs' estate and villages are confiscated from them by government decree. In the finale, the slacker Mitrofanushka is sent to serve.

Similar image life and lack of sensible education were common among the children of the provincial nobility in those years, therefore Mitrofanushka in the play is depicted not as a special case of unsuccessful upbringing, but as an image of the era. The hero's appearance is not directly described in the play, but it can be assumed that Mitrofanushka looked like a typical representative of the provincial noble youth of that time.

The hero is not inclined to constructive activities, study, work or any meaningful activities. Chasing pigeons, having fun, eating too much, in a word, somehow killing time in simple entertainment - these are Mitrofanushka’s life goals, and the mother in every possible way encourages such behavior of the hero.

The characterization of the hero looks unpleasant - Mitrofanushka is greedy and stingy, rude, prone to intrigue, deception and fraud, like his mother. Prostakova loves her son, despite her characteristic cruelty towards other people, Mitrofanushka betrayed her mother, pushed her away when the mother tried to find support from the hero.

Mitrofanushka is essentially an egoist, she thinks exclusively about her own comfort, without being interested in her family. The hero’s attitude towards learning is quite clear - Mitrofanushka calls one of the teachers a “garrison rat”; any attempts to give the young man at least some knowledge are met with his complete reluctance to learn.

• Fonvizin wrote the play “The Minor” in the village of Strelino near Moscow.
• After the play became popular, the word “minor” became widespread in colloquial speech, and the name Mitrofanushka became associated with the image of an ignorant person and an ignoramus.
• On the pages of the magazine “Friend of Honest People, or Starodum,” a kind of literary game associated with the play. The magazine published a letter allegedly written by Sophia, the heroine of the play, where she complained about her lover Milon, a young officer who in the play prevented the kidnapping of the heroine. He allegedly married her, and then cheated on her with a certain “disdainful woman.” In the reply letter, Starodum, the heroine’s uncle, consoles her. In such a funny way, the play received a plot continuation.

• In the play, Sophia reads a book by a real-life author - the 18th-century French educator and theologian Francois Fenelon, who wrote the treatise “On the Education of Girls.” Starodum, Sophia's uncle, mentions the then famous novel by this author, “The Adventures of Telemachus.”
• Fonvizin had to spend several months to achieve production. They did not want to stage the play either in Moscow or in St. Petersburg; the censors were frightened by the boldness of the remarks that the author allowed himself through the mouths of the characters. Volny was the first to decide to stage the play. Russian Theater In Petersburg. The success of the first production was deafening - “the audience applauded the play by throwing wallets.” After this, the play was staged many times, including in Moscow. The popularity of the comedy “The Minor” is evidenced by the appearance of a large number of amateur and student productions.

• The role of Mrs. Prostakova was played by a writer, performing in student performances while studying at the Nezhin gymnasium.
• The image of Mitrofanushka is compared with the young officer and nobleman from Pushkin’s story “ Captain's daughter" Both heroes in their youth indulged in laziness and idleness, both got bad teachers who taught the heroes nothing, but Grinev, unlike Mitrofanushka, is shown as an honest and good-natured person.

Quotes

“And I, uncle, almost didn’t have dinner at all. Three slices of corned beef, and hearth slices, I don’t remember, five, I don’t remember, six.”

“The whole night I had such crap in my eyes.<...>either you, mother, or father.”

“I don’t want to study, I want to get married.”

“I myself, mother, am not one for clever people. Your brother is always better.”

“Door, which door? This? Adjective. Because it is attached to its place. Over there at the closet of the pole for a week the door has not yet been hung: so for now that is a noun.”

“As soon as I start to fall asleep, I see that you, mother, deign to beat father.”

Mitrofan is an undergrowth, a negative character in a comedy, a young nobleman. He is very similar to his mother, Mrs. Prostakova, and brother Taras Skotinin. In Mitrofan, in Mrs. Prostakova, in Skotinin one can notice such character traits as greed and selfishness. Mitrofanushka knows that all power in the house belongs to his mother, who loves him and allows him to behave the way he wants. Mitrofan is lazy, does not like and does not know how to work and study, he only frolics, has fun and sits in the dovecote. It’s not so much the mama’s boy himself who influences those around him, as they influence him, trying to raise the little boy as an honest, educated person, and he is like his mother in everything. Mitrofan treats his servants very cruelly, insults them and generally does not consider them to be people:

Eremeevna. Yes, learn at least a little.
Mitrofan. Well, say another word, you old bastard! I’ll finish them off; I’ll complain to my mother again, so she’ll deign to give you a task like yesterday.

Mitrofan also has no respect for teachers. He strives only for his own personal benefit, and when he learns that Sophia has become the heiress of Starodum, he immediately intends to offer her his hand and heart, and the attitude towards Sophia in the Prostakovs’ house changes significantly in better side. And all this is only because of greed and cunning, and not because of the feat of the heart.

Mitrofan is depicted in the comedy “The Minor” very vividly, vitally, with many human vices, and Mrs. Prostakova simply dotes on her son:

Mrs. Prostakova. ... We don’t regret the last crumbs, just to teach our son everything. My Mitrofanushka doesn’t get up for days because of a book. My mother's heart. It’s a pity, it’s a pity, but just think: for that the child will be in any way... The groom is no matter who, but still the teachers go, he doesn’t waste an hour, and now two of them are waiting in the hallway... My Mitrofanushka has no peace either day or night.

The opposite of Mitrofan is Sophia, a young, kind, reasonable girl.

The main problem that led Fonvizin to create the image of Mitrofan is education to a small extent - serfdom (this generally refers to relationships between people of different social positions).

Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor” was staged in the theater in 1782. The historical prototype of the “Miscellaneous” was the title of a noble teenager who did not complete his studies. During Fonvizin’s time, the burdens of compulsory service increased at the same time as the weakening...

(based on the comedy by D. I. Fonvizin “The Minor”) The name of D. I. Fonvizin rightfully belongs to the number of names that make up the pride of Russian national culture. His comedy “The Minor” - the ideological and artistic pinnacle of creativity - has become one of the classic examples...

The famous comedy by D. I. Fonvizin “The Minor” is distinguished by its great social depth and sharp satirical orientation. In essence, this is where Russian social comedy begins. The play continues the traditions of classicism, but later...

Mitrofanushka (Prostakov Mitrofan) is the son of the landowners Prostakovs. It is considered an undergrowth because he is 16 years old and has not reached the age of majority. Following the tsar's decree, Mitrofanushka studies. But he does this with great reluctance. He is characterized by stupidity, ignorance and laziness...

The problem of raising children, the legacy destined for the country, played an important role in society in the old days and remains relevant to this day. Members of the Prostakov family are strangers to each other. They don't look like a strong, loving family at all. Mrs. Prostakova is rude...

Writer and playwright D.I. Fonvizin, whose comedy “The Brigadier” never left the stage, was compared to Moliere. Therefore, the play “The Minor,” staged on the stage of the Moscow Medox Theater on May 14, 1783, was also a huge success.

One of the main characters of this comedy was Prostakov Mitrofan Terentyevich, the son of the Prostakovs, simply Mitrofanushka.

As soon as the name of the comedy “Undergrown” is pronounced, the image of a mama’s boy, a quitter and a stupid ignoramus immediately appears in the imagination. Before this comedy, the word “minor” did not carry an ironic meaning. During the time of Peter I, this was the name given to noble teenagers who had not reached the age of 15. After the play appeared, this word became a household word.

Myself main character- Mitrofanushka is deprived of any purpose in life. The main activities in life that he enjoys are: eating, lazing around and chasing pigeons. His idleness is encouraged by his mother. “Go and have some fun, Mitrofanushka,” is how she answers her son when he is about to go chase pigeons.

A sixteen-year-old boy at that time was supposed to go to service at this age, but his mother did not want to let him go. She wanted to keep him with her until she was 26 years old.

Prostakova doted on her son, she loved him blindly motherly love, which only harmed him: Mitrofanushka ate until his stomach hurt, and Prostakova tried to persuade him to eat more. The nanny said to this that he already ate five pieces of pies. And Prostakova answered: “So you feel sorry for the sixth one.”

When Mitrofanushka was offended, she came to his defense, and he was her only consolation. Everything was done only for the sake of her son, even in order to provide him with a carefree future, she decided to marry him to a rich bride.

She tried not to bother him with anything, not even with his studies. It was customary for noble families to hire teachers. And Prostakova hired teachers for him, but not so that he could learn intelligence, but it was just the way it was supposed to be. The names of the teachers spoke for themselves: the German coachman Vralman, the retired soldier Tsyfirkin, the half-educated seminarian Kuteikin. Mitrofan did not want to study and told his mother: “Listen, mother. I'll amuse you. I'll study; just to have it last time. The hour of my will has come. I don’t want to study, I want to get married.” And Prostakova agreed with him, because she herself was illiterate and stupid. “It’s only torment for you, but everything, I see, is emptiness. Don’t learn this stupid science!”

All his relatives irritated Mitrofanushka, he did not love anyone - neither his father, nor his uncle. The nanny, who did not receive money for raising Mitrofan and always protected him from his uncle, tried to teach him something. She persuaded him: “Yes, teach at least a little.” Mitrofan answered her: “Well, say another word, you old bastard! I’ll finish them off, I’ll complain to my mother again, so she’ll deign to give you a task about yesterday.” Nobody's worries bothered him. This hero combined in himself the worst qualities of the young nobles of that time.

All the mother's concerns about her son did not find an answer. Mitrofanushka treated his mother with disdain. He did not respect her at all and played on her feelings: His words: “The river is here and the river is close. I’ll dive in, just remember what my name was,” or “All night, such rubbish was in my eyes. -What rubbish, Mitrofanushka? “Yes, either you, mother, or father,” prove this.

Even at a difficult moment for the mother, the son refuses her. “You are the only one left with me, my dear friend,” - with these words Prostakova rushes to her son. She seems to be looking for support in the only person close to her. Mitrofan indifferently throws out: “Go away, mother, how you imposed yourself.”

His mother's upbringing and the environment in which Mitrofan Prostakov lived made him a heartless, stupid animal who only knows what to eat and have fun. The thoughts instilled in Mitrofan by his mother that lying on his side could get both ranks and money fell on fertile ground. We can conclude that Mitrofan, had his fate turned out the way his mother intended, would not have disgraced his “surname.”

It seems to me that the meaning of this comedy is the playwright’s protest against the Prostakovs and Skotinins. There should be as few such inhumane, rude, stupid people as possible. They should not constitute the majority of society. I share the writer's point of view.

The eighteenth century gave Russian (and world, of course) literature many outstanding names and talented figures. One of them is Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin, writer and playwright. Most people know him as the author of the comedy “The Minor.” How was the author's most famous work created, who did he base his characters on, and what is special about one of the characters in the play - Mitrofanushka?

Denis Fonvizin

Before talking about the comedy itself, it is necessary to at least briefly say about its author. Denis Fonvizin did not live too long (only forty-seven years), but bright life. Most people know him only as the person who wrote “The Minor,” while he wrote the play “The Brigadier,” many translations and adaptations, treatises and essays.

Despite the fact that he wrote only two plays (and after “The Brigadier” he did not turn to drama for more than ten years), it was Fonvizin who is the “progenitor” of the so-called Russian everyday comedy.

“Minor” by Fonvizin: history of creation

Despite the fact that “The Minor” was completed by the writer and politician in the early eighties, there is reason to believe that Fonvizin conceived his satirical “comedy of manners” back in the sixties: it was to this time that the play, which first saw the light only in the last century, dates back to during the author's life it was never published. Its characters can be called early prototypes of the heroes of “The Minor”: in each of them familiar features are easily discernible.

While working on the comedy, Denis Ivanovich used a huge variety of sources - both articles and works of various authors (both modern and past centuries), and even texts written by Catherine the Great herself. Having finished work on “The Minor,” Fonvizin, of course, decided to stage the play, although he understood that it would be difficult to do so - the abundance of new ideas and bold statements blocked the work’s path to a wide audience. Nevertheless, he himself took up the preparation of the performance and, albeit slowly, although with all sorts of delays, “The Minor” was released in the theater on Tsaritsyn Meadow and received phenomenal success with the audience. This happened in 1782, and a year later the play was published for the first time.

Who is this little guy?

Many people are genuinely puzzled by the title of the work. In fact, why - an undergrowth? What kind of word is this anyway? It's simple. In the eighteenth century (and it was then that Denis Fonvizin lived and worked), a young man of noble (that is, noble) origin who did not receive an education was called a “minor.” A lazy, stupid person, incapable of anything - that's what he is. Such young men could not get a job, and they were not given a marriage license.

Denis Ivanovich called his work “Minor” because this is exactly what Mitrofanushka, one of the main characters, is like. He put a little more satire into this word than it actually had. The minor, with the light hand of Fonvizin, is not only an uneducated, but also a selfish and rude young man. The characteristics of the image of Mitrofanushka will be presented in more detail below.

The plot of “The Minor” revolves around a modest girl, Sophia, left without parents and therefore taken into care by the Prostakov family, greedy and narrow-minded people. Sophia is a rich heiress, a bride of marriageable age, and both the Prostakovs want to get a wife with such a dowry, trying to marry her off to their sixteen-year-old son Mitrofanushka, a minor, and Prostakova’s brother Skotinin, obsessed with the idea of ​​a large number of livestock on Sophia’s farm. Sophia has a loved one - Milon, to whom her only relative - Uncle Starodum - wants to marry her. He comes to the Prostakovs and is very surprised to see how the owners are currying favor with him and his niece. They are trying to show Mitrofanushka in the best light, but the uneducated and lazy lump spoils all his mother’s attempts.

Having learned that Starodum and Milon are taking Sophia away, at night, on the orders of the Prostakovs, they try to kidnap her, but Milon prevents the kidnapping. It all ends with the Prostakovs losing not only their profitable bride, but also their estates - it’s all to blame for their greed, anger and selfishness.

Main characters

The main characters of “The Minor” are the already mentioned Mitrofanushka, his parents (it should be noted that everything in this family is run by the mother, who does not consider the servants to be people, and strongly follows the fashion of the time; the father of the family is completely under the heel of his domineering wife, who even raises her hand against him), Sophia, her uncle Starodum, fiancé Milon, government official Pravdin, whose goal is to expose the atrocities of the Prostakovs (in which he ultimately succeeds). It is necessary to pay special attention to the fact that Fonvizin used “speaking” names for his characters - they are endowed with both positive (Starodum, Pravdin, Sophia) and negative (Skotinin, Prostakovs) characters. In the characterization of Mitrofanushka, his name is also of great importance - from Greek “Mitrofan” means “mama’s son,” which truly fully reflects the character of the hero. Only at the very end of the play does Mitrofanushka quarrel with his mother and tells her to leave him alone.

Fonvizin pits completely different social strata against each other in his work - officials, nobles, and servants are represented here... He openly ridicules the nobles and their upbringing, condemns people like the Prostakovs. From the very first words of the play, it is easy to understand where the positive and negative characters are and what the author’s attitude is towards each of them. Largely thanks to the beautifully written images negative characters(especially the characterization of Mitrofanushka) “comedy of manners” brought such success to its creator. The name Mitrofanushka has generally become a household name. In addition, the play was dismantled into idioms with quotes.

The characteristics of Mitrofanushka should be given special attention. However, first it is necessary to say about three more characters in the play. These are Mitrofanushka’s teachers - Tsyfirkin, Kuteikin and Vralman. They cannot be directly classified as positive, nor do they belong to a type of people in whom both good and bad are equally combined. However, their surnames are also “telling”: and they speak about the main quality of a person - for example, for Vralman it is lying, and for Tsyfirkin it is love for mathematics.

“Minor”: characteristics of Mitrofanushka

The character in whose honor the work is named is almost sixteen years old. While many at his age are completely independent adults, Mitrofanushka cannot take a step without her mother’s prompting, without holding on to her skirt. He is one of those who is called a “mama’s boy” (and as mentioned above, a direct indication of this is contained even in the meaning of his name). Despite the fact that Mitrofanushka has a father, the boy does not receive a male education in the full sense of the word - his father himself is not famous for such qualities.

For parents, Mitrofanushka is still Small child- even in his presence they talk about him in exactly this way, calling him a child, a child - and Mitrofanushka shamelessly uses this throughout the comedy. The boy doesn’t think anything of his father, thereby once again proving that he is a perfect “mama’s boy.” Very indicative in this regard is the scene where Mitrofan pities his mother, who is tired of beating her father - so she, poor thing, worked hard beating him. There is no question of sympathizing with the father.

It is not entirely possible to give a brief description of Mitrofanushka in “The Minor” - so much can be said about this character. For example, he really likes to eat a hearty meal, and then - to relax to his heart’s content without doing anything (however, he doesn’t have much to do except study, in which, it must be honestly noted, he is not at all diligent). Like his mother, Mitrofan is a rather heartless person. He loves to humiliate others, putting them below himself, once again “showing a place” to people working for him. Thus, he constantly offends his nanny, who has been assigned to him since birth, but who is always on his side. This is another revealing moment in the characterization of Mitrofanushka from the comedy “The Minor.”

Mitrofanushka is a sneak and an insolent person, but at the same time he is also a sycophant: already at that age he feels who should not be rude, in front of whom he should “show his best qualities.” The only trouble is that with such a mother’s upbringing best qualities Mitrofanushka simply cannot have it. Even to her, the one who loves him so blindly and allows him everything, he threatens and blackmails her in an attempt to achieve what he wants for himself. Such qualities do not honor the characterization of Mitrofanushka, speaking of him as a bad person, ready to go over his head for the sake of only himself and his demands, as a person who loves only as long as his will is fulfilled.

It is interesting that Mitrofan is characterized by self-criticism: he is aware that he is lazy and stupid. However, he is not at all upset about this, declaring that he is “not a hunter of smart girls.” It is unlikely that such a quality passed to him from his mother; rather, he adopted it from his father - at least he should have inherited something from him. This is a brief description of Mitrofanushka, a hero whose name has been used for several centuries to name people with similar character traits.

Was there a boy?

It is known that Fonvizin “peeped” the scenes for his work in real life. What about the heroes? Are they completely invented or copied from real people?

The characterization of the hero Mitrofanushka gives reason to believe that his prototype was Alexey Olenin. He subsequently became known as a statesman and historian, as well as an artist. But until the age of eighteen, his behavior was absolutely similar to the characteristics of Mitrofanushka: he did not want to study, was rude, lazy, as they say, “wasted his life.” It is believed that it was Fonvizin’s comedy that helped Alexei Olenin “take the right path”: supposedly, after reading it, he recognized himself in the main character, saw his portrait from the outside for the first time and was so shocked that he gained motivation for “rebirth.”

Whether this is true or not, it is now impossible to know for sure. But some facts from Olenin’s biography have been preserved. Thus, until he was ten years old, he was raised by his father and a specially hired tutor, and he was also educated at home. When he went to school (and not just any school, but the Page Court), he was soon sent to continue his studies abroad - he was chosen for this purpose, since little Alyosha demonstrated excellent progress in his studies. Abroad, he graduated from two higher institutions - thus, there is no need to say that Olenin was lazy and ignorant, like Mitrofanushka. It is quite possible that some of the qualities inherent in Olenin were reminiscent of the characteristics of Mitrofanushka, however, most likely, it is impossible to say that Olenin is a 100% prototype of the Fonvizin hero. It is more likely that Mitrofan is some kind of collective image.

The meaning of the comedy “Minor” in literature

“The Minor” has been studied for more than two centuries - from the very release of the play to this day. Its importance is difficult to overestimate: it satirically ridicules the social and even state structure of society. And he does this openly, without even fearing the authorities - and yet it was precisely because of this that Catherine the Great, after the publication of “The Minor,” forbade the publication of anything coming from the pen of Fonvizin.

His comedy highlights the pressing issues of the time, but they remain no less relevant today. The shortcomings of society that existed in the eighteenth century have not disappeared in the twenty-first. With the light hand of Pushkin, the play was called a “folk comedy” - it has every right to be called that in our days.

1. In the first version of the play, Mitrofanushka is called Ivanushka.
2. The initial version of the comedy is closer to the play “The Brigadier”.
3. Fonvizin worked on Minor for about three years.
4. He drew ideas for writing from life, but he talked about the creation of only one scene - the one where Eremeevna protects her pupil from Skotinin.
5. When Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol was studying at the gymnasium, he played the role of Mrs. Prostakova in school productions.
6. Fonvizin sketched out the continuation of “The Minor” in letters from Sophia and Starodum to each other: according to the author’s idea, after the wedding, Milon cheated on Sophia, about which she complained to her uncle.
7. The idea of ​​creating such a work first came to Denis Ivanovich when he was in France.

More than two centuries have passed since the creation of the play, and it does not lose its relevance to this day. More and more research is being devoted to the study of comedy itself and its individual characters. This means that Denis Fonvizin managed to notice and highlight something in his work that will always attract the attention of readers and viewers.

Meaning of the name

One of the main characters in the comedy D.I. Fonvizin “Undergrown” appears Prostakov Mitrofan, a young nobleman, an undergrowth. Translated, the name Mitrofan means “revealing his mother.” And the young man successfully confirms his name.

Already with youth Mitrofan learned to be rude and disrespectful towards people. Like Prostakov, he perceives serfs as objects without feelings and emotions. The same way his mother treats his father - she scolds him, sometimes raises her hand at him, so Mitrofan treats his parents - even in a simple conversation he calls them both rubbish. And in a difficult moment for the mother (at the end of the play) he completely abandons her.

Prostakova’s influence on the development of a teenager’s personality

The mother showed concern for her son's education, but she did this only as a diversion - guided by the state decree on the need for science to enter the service.

Mitrofan's teachers cannot be called specialists, but even the little that they try to convey to him, he is not able to perceive. Perhaps the mother’s influence is also evident here - she convinces her son to study only for the eyes, asks him not to listen too much to the words of the teachers, and to focus more on her advice. Of all the teachers, only Vralman praises the undergrowth, wanting to win Prostakova’s favor. But the name of Adam Adamych speaks for itself.

Listening to his mother’s advice, Mitrofan did not know the basic rules of grammar and arithmetic, had no idea about the history of the country and geographical location states

Attitude towards relatives

Despite his mother's care, Mitrofan has no respect for either her or his father. Here, too, the example of the mother is significant - she does not respect anyone around her, and her son behaves the same way. He doesn’t feel sorry for Prostakova at all, he neglects her, doesn’t respect her, plays with her feelings for his own whim.

His father has more for him lower value. Most likely because Prostakov, fearing his wife’s anger, constantly praises his son, for no reason at all. Mitrofan was always rude to Uncle and was afraid of his anger. In other words, no one from the undergrowth’s family received his love. I think he simply didn’t know how to love and didn’t know that such a feeling even existed.

Conclusion

In the finale of the comedy, everyone gets what they deserve: Prostakova renounces his own son, Mitrofan goes to serve. We can only hope that the service will have a beneficial effect on him, and he will at least understand something in this life, realize his mistakes and correct them.

Modern young people should also think about the problem of Mitrofan. It is no coincidence that the work has not lost its relevance in our time - today's underage people sometimes commit the same offenses as Mitrofanushka almost three centuries ago.